Platform access for authorities

Work queue, case files, copies and queries

• The work queue

  In the console, with a named account for each analyst: domains at elevated severity within the authority’s scope, with reachability, markets served and processing status. Search in plain language, saved and shared filters, case assignment, labels.

• The case file of every domain

  Certificate Transparency entry coordinates and inclusion proof on request; page copy; classification record. As a PDF, in the three languages.

• The preserved copies

  Viewable in isolation in the viewer and downloadable in WARC format.

• The comparison with warnings

  For every domain, the warnings naming it and from which authorities; a filter by reporting authority separates domains your warnings cite from those cited by other authorities and those no one cites.

• Linked subjects

  For every domain, the others that declare the same legal entity, with the sentence the name is extracted from.

• Querying a domain

  Exact, root and similarity search across the domains the filter has retained, with what became of them: “seen and discarded” and “never seen” are two different answers.

• Exports

  Lists in Excel and CSV, case file as PDF, copies in WARC, the raw event stream.

• Feed and API

  Detections as a stream, the list and detail of cases, querying and checking a domain, with a named key and an organisation-scoped ambit.

• System status

  Every reading with its time and duration, with no automatic refresh: you can see how old what you’re reading is.

The forms are the same for every authority; the scope, for instance markets and languages, is agreed.

Let’s examine a case together.

Request a demonstration: from selecting domains to examining the collected material and exporting a case file.

State the institution, the unit and the scope of interest: markets, languages, types of service. We reply with a proposed scope and with the accounts, one per analyst.

Alternatively, write to:

Access is named, free of charge and revocable at any time by either party.

Already have an account: Sign in to the platform ↗

Feedback requested on detections

We ask the authority, where possible, for a relevance judgement on the detections it has examined, within the limits of professional secrecy.

With that judgement the false-positive rate becomes measurable, and detections can be tuned to the cases that matter to the authority.

Architectural elements and measured latencies